MONTY THE ANSWER 
        MAN ARCHIVE 
        Swift 
        Continental IO-360 Information 
        
          CONTINENTAL IO-360 
        AD...  
        AD 97-26-17, (replace airmelt crank with vacuum arc remelt {VAC} crank), 
        has been mailed to all those concerned and includes the straight IO-360s 
        (not just the turbos). Apparently, FAA data showed that 5 of the 8 airmelt 
        crankshaft failures occurred on IO-360 (non-turbo) engines and of the 
        five, two had more than 1,200 hours total time. The FAAs position 
        is that the failures are random and time in service is not the determining 
        factor.  So, how to tell which crank is which? Swifter Jim Montague 
        has the following advice: 
        As you probably know 
        by now, AD 97-26-17 is out; making replacement of Continental IO-360 crankshafts 
        mandatory at overhaul. FYI - A VAR crank may be identified by removing 
        the propeller. A 6 digit serial number will be visible on the crankshaft 
        flange. From memory, an airmelt crank might have a part number, 639200, 
        in ink on the flange (or 639786), this is not a serial number. Otherwise, 
        when #6 cylinder is removed, VAR should be visible cast on the crank cheek. 
        
        WOW! THE ANWSER MAN HAS 
        A QUESTION !!! 
        From Jim Montague...(posted on the Yahoo! Globe Temco Swift Club page) 
        I maintain a Swift with an IO-360 Cont. engine. When it sits for over 
        a month it idles very rough and will hardly run at less than full throttle. 
        At idle, the mixture control needs to be backed out considerably, just 
        to run. After a hour or so of running, it seems ok. If the airplane is 
        flown at least every week, this problem never shows up. The fuel injection 
        components were sent in to a repair station - no trouble was found. I 
        suspect something with the fuel pump. Any ideas? 
        Answer from Tony Jolly (agjolly@netdoor.com) 
        With the symptoms you gave there are a couple of things that might be 
        a problem. 
        1. I understand this is a fuel Injected engine - If this is true, there 
        should be some sort of fuel regulation to the injection system. If this 
        is sticking open and allowing to much fuel pressure it could cause the 
        symptoms. 
        2. As fuel sits for extended periods, some contaminates or additives of 
        the fuel could fall out or make deposits in the fuel system. You might 
        try turning off your fuel - when you know it will be down for a while 
        - and starve the engine of fuel for final shutdown. 
        3. It could be something in the Air components of the fuel system because 
        it sounds as if it is running very rich. 
        
        WOW! THE ANSWER MAN HAS 
        A QUESTION !!! PART TWO... 
        We ran the following question from Jim Montague last month: 
        From Jim Montague...(posted on the Yahoo! Globe Temco Swift Club page) 
        I maintain a Swift with an IO-360 Cont. engine. When it sits for over 
        a month it idles very rough and will hardly run at less than full throttle. 
        At idle, the mixture control needs to be backed out considerably, just 
        to run. After a hour or so of running, it seems ok. If the airplane is 
        flown at least every week, this problem never shows up. The fuel injection 
        components were sent in to a repair station - no trouble was found. I 
        suspect something with the fuel pump. Any ideas? 
        Here is a reply from Michael 
        Kennedy of the Swift Magic Aerobatic Team (SMAT3@aol.com)... 
        Jim: 
        I have had this problem a few times with my Swift after long period of 
        not running -- mainly when I was still in the AF flying fighters and away 
        on overseas duties.  The problem is the O-ring in the fuel controller 
        at the throttle butterfly valve. It has a tendency to shrink up when not 
        in contact with fuel. This causes the rough running with too much fuel 
        by passing to the injection manifold valve. After the O-ring has been 
        in contact with fuel it gets back to normal size and the problem goes 
        away. Lowell and I took awhile figuring this out when we were both in 
        the Miami area. Instead of running the engine to clear this up, you can 
        try running your boost pump the day before you are going to fly. This 
        will get fuel through the system and the O-ring should be back to normal 
        the next day.   --  Michael Kennedy 
        PS. You are not supposed to open the fuel metering housing to change the 
        O-ring. But there is nothing in there but the metering ring with the O-ring 
        around it. 
        LYCOMING VS CONTINENTAL 
        AIRSTARTS... From Swifter Madison Jones... 
        On the Cont. IO-360 fuel starvation issue, I can certainly attest to how 
        difficult it is to get them going again compared to the Lycoming IO-360. 
        After having run the aux tanks empty rountinely to the point of engine 
        stoppage (on the Lycoming), and then having the fire light right off, 
        no problemo, I was not concerned when, flying a friends Continental 
        IO-360, the engine quit due to having the aux tank run dry over the mountains 
        one nice day when I was at 9,500 msl. By the time it started running 
        again, I had descended to BELOW the level of the adjacent ground level, 
        and was in the Spokane River cut through the mountains, approximately 
        4000 msl.  Not only must you use the fuel boost, you must be 
        careful about it lest you flood the system (or whatever I did for over 
        5000). For those who have not totally lost an engine before, be 
        aware that even at reasonable  glide speeds of about 85 mph, in flat 
        pitch a Swift drops like a piano tossed out the 10th story window. The 
        whole adventure didnt take more than a couple of minutes, but I 
        did appreciate the difference between  Lycoming and Continental injection 
        systems. Needless to say, I like the Lycoming much better. ----Madison 
        Jones 
         
        SMAT 3 CHECKS IN...  
        News from Swift Magic Aerobatic Team member Michael Kennedy (smat3@aol.com) 
        and his opinion on the Continental IO-360 airstart problem related by 
        Swifter Madison Jones (ab5tv@ix.netcom.com) in last months Swiftweb: 
        
        Note on Continental airstart. 
        The altitude was the problem. At 9500 ft you can only use low boost when 
        the engine stops. High boost will flood it out until you get to lower 
        altitude. We run our tanks dry all the time to insure they are empty before 
        performing for a show. I have never had more than a few seconds of silence 
        and not lost any altitude. This is why the Continental IO-360 STC has 
        a two position fuel boost switch included. High boost is only to prime 
        for start. It can be used to catch a empty tank, but even at lower altitudes 
        it could be too much. I have a two light warning system for my boost switch 
        - Yellow, low boost on, RED high boost on. You need to know which boost 
        position is selected, especially if you loose the engine pump at low altitude. 
        High boost could keep you from getting your engine restarted.  -- 
         Michael Kennedy 
        CONTINENTAL IO-360 OIL 
        CAPACITY... (7399) 
        Subject: Re: Oil capacity 
        From: Pete King <peetking@earthlink.net> 
        Hi, Jim, 
        The Continental IO360 has a 10 quart sump. However they won't operate 
        at that capacity -- since it seems to throw out anything over 6 quarts. 
        The engine would run cooler with 10. Do you know of a FIX ? Regards, Pete 
        King 
        Pete: 
        We have several IO-360's here locally and none seem to have that problem. 
        On my O-300 I run 6 or 7 quarts to avoid throwing out the last quart. 
        I will ask some of the IO-360 guys about this, but I don't believe anyone 
        has to run over a quart low. -- Jim 
        CONTINENTAL IO-360s THROWING 
        OUT OIL... (7499) 
        Subject: Re: Oil capacity 
        From: Pete King <peetking@earthlink.net> 
        Hi, Jim, 
        The Continental IO360 has a 10 quart sump. However they won't operate 
        at that capacity -- since it seems to throw out anything over 6 quarts. 
        The engine would run cooler with 10. Do you know of a FIX ? Regards, Pete 
        King 
        Pete: 
        I polled the local IO-360 owners. Doc Goodlad has no problem with throwing 
        oil out. (IO-360C)  Daryl Dressler has no problem. (IO-360D) Harry 
        Lyon uses hardly any oil. (IO-360D) Mark Holliday uses no oil with his 
        IO-360A but says their Skyhawk XP with the IO-360K threw out anything 
        over 6 quarts. That sump was meant to hold 8 quarts. I guess thats all 
        I know. -- Jim 
         
        CONTINENTAL IO-360 STUFF... (7499) 
        From: Sandb12345@aol.com 
        Subject: N80776 update 
        Again thanks for the updates! Lots of good information. Something to think 
        about! N80776 has a Cont.I0-360-C. Ran fine at sea level but above five 
        thousand feet on take off would surge and quit. Some use of the boost 
        pump kept the engine running out of Clayton NM. Then in the air the air 
        pressure on the vent kept it running. But no way out of Durango NM. almost 
        seven thousand feet. Left it there. (the company I flew for had a citation 
        that flew in to Durango twice a week) Went back four times taking off 
        fuel pumps, injection system ect. All rebuilt still wouldn't run. Checked 
        the fitting on the Dukes pump found a loose fitting from the tank to the 
        pump, tightened it and Wa-La it ran. I flew it home after 20 days on the 
        ramp! It still has a problem with cutting out when it's hot, but I plan 
        on tracing the fuel line from the tank up. Any body have any ideas? 
        The STC for the 210 installation 
        details how the resistors are wired in to make a high and low speed pump. 
        It involves 2ea. 2 ohm resistors in the "hi boost" and one 2 ohm resistor 
        in the "lo boost" side of the switch. Did not whoever did your engine 
        installation do that? Did they not place a copy of the STC in the aircraft 
        records?  I would double check everything. But I think you have found 
        the main culprit. Did whoever who did your conversion route the vapor 
        return line per the STC? It's important! I have seen several that are 
        not per the STC!  --  Jim 
        From: Don Bartholomew <spectro@nanosecond.com> 
        Organization: The Aeroplane Factory 
        Subject: Re: N80776 update 
        Check the fuel lines for 
        the old style stainless braid Aeroquip hose. These had a nasty problem 
        of developing small holes that would suck air in, but would not leak air 
        out. If you have this type of line, replace all of them with either a 
        rubber outer braid Aeroquip or Stratoflex stainless. 
        Another item to check is 
        where the return line from the injector pump is going. It should go the 
        the top of the fuel neck, just under the gauge. If it goes to any place 
        that has fuel standing, like the sump, there is to much back pressure, 
        and this can cause a problem of running rich. You stated you changed the 
        pump and injection, but was the injection set up per Continental Service 
        Bulletin SID97-3? Just because the pressures were set when the pump/injection 
        was rebuilt, doesn't mean that it is correct for the installation. By 
        setting the system per the SB, you can get an idea if you are sucking 
        air from the pressure gauge readings. 
        The pump called for in the 
        STC is a single speed pump that runs through resistors both for high and 
        low speed. If you don't have ALL the paperwork for the STC, contact Suzanne 
        Evans at Merlyn Products and get the paperwork then check what is supposed 
        to be against what is there.  --  Good luck -- Don Bartholomew 
        
        From: SMAT3@aol.com 
        Subject: IO-360 reply 
        Sheridan: 
        The Dukes boost pump for the IO-360 has two speeds through resistors. 
        The High setting is for priming the engine for start and the low speed 
        to back up the engine driven pump. The high speed side can flood the engine 
        if used in flight -- there is a noticeable increase in fuel pressure if 
        you turn it on in flight and it will change your mixture considerably. 
        It is not recommended to turn the boost pump on during take off or landing 
        except if your engine driven quits -- i.e., the engine stops and you don't 
        know why -- boost on and switch tanks!(assuming you have long range tanks 
        too) Many of us have placed the boost pump switch near the throttle so 
        it is easy to reach in an emergency. Interestingly enough, Beechcraft 
        also states that the boost pump should not be used except in an emergency 
        for my Bonanza too. 
        As for the IO-360 problem, 
        I would ask if you have the proper mixture set at the throttle body. This 
        mixture is set with a screw head in a sleeve on the side of the throttle 
        body where the hose goes to the injector spider and must be adjusted for 
        each individual aircraft. A simple check is to run the engine at 1000 
        rpm and slowly pull out the mixture. The rpm should rise about 50 rpm 
        just before the engine quits. If it does not rise but just quits suddenly, 
        the mixture is too lean. This would be very noticeable when the engine 
        is hot and you push the throttle in -- it would also be cured by turning 
        on the boost pump which makes the mixture run rich. If the rpm gains much 
        over 150 rpm before stopping, it is too rich. This should not cause cutting 
        out unless it is really rich which would be very noticeable on the above 
        check. If you have checked this and the fuel lines, I do not have any 
        other ideas right now. -- Michael Kennedy 
        (Editor's note... Got this 
        reply from Sheridan: "Didn't think I would have all this expert advice! 
        This is a neat group! Thanks for your speedy reply!!! Sheridan") 
        
         
        
        On to more IO-360 Stuff  --  Page 
        Two 
        
         
       Back 
        to the archive index...
        
           |